Journal of Speech and Hearing Research Vol.38 526-535 June 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Titze, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, L. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Titze, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, L. O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison Between Clinician-Assisted and Fully Automated Procedures for Obtaining a Voice Range Profile

Ingo R. Titze 1
Darrell Wong 1
Martin A. Milder 1
Susan R. Hensley 1

Lorraine O. Ramig 1
1 Wilbur James Gould Voice Research Center Denver Center for the Performing Arts Denver, CO National Center for Voice and Speech Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology The University of Iowa Iowa City

A comparison was made between two methods of obtaining a voice range profile. One method was traditional, involving a clinician who gave instructions, motivated the subject to achieve the greatest intensity range, and determined when the goal was achieved. The second method was completely automated, involving the use of a videotape for instruction and a computer for elicitation and evaluation. Ten men and 10 women with normal voices participated as subjects in the study, and a counterbalanced design was used. Results indicated that there is no obvious preference for the use of either method, although considerable individual differences are noted.

KEY WORDS: voice range profile, phonetogram, automated, clinician assisted, intensity, fundamental frequency

Submitted on July 27, 1993
Accepted on November 8, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?