JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.41 603-617 June 1998.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Qualls, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Qualls, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Written Language Comprehension in Younger and Older Adults

Joyce L. Harris 1
Wendy A. Rogers 2

Constance D. Qualls 1

1 The University of Memphis Tennessee
2 The University of Georgia Athens

This study examined the effects of text genre and repeated reading on written language comprehension in younger (M = 21 years) and older (M = 72 years) healthy adults (N = 54). Participants verified four text-based statements (i.e., explicit, implicit, contradictory, and elaborated) after reading expository, narrative, and procedural texts. Verification accuracy was comparable for both age groups; however, text genre, statement-type, and repeated reading produced significant effects. Expository passages, explicit and implicit statements, and repeated reading yielded superior results. Procedural passages and contradictory and elaborated statements yielded less accurate results. Statement-types invoked multiple levels of cognitive representation across text genres and age groups. Overall, reading time was significantly faster for younger adults, and readingtimes were significantly faster for both age groups during the repeated reading trial. Text genre also influenced reading time, with expository passages read faster than narrative and procedural passages. These findings suggest theappreciable influences of text genre and repeated reading on measures of text processing and comprehension in healthy adults, irrespective of age.

KEY WORDS: written language comprehension, aging, text genre, cognitive representation, reading time

Submitted on February 4, 1997
Accepted on September 15, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
E. J. Hester and R. Stevens-Ratchford
Health Literacy and the Role of the Speech-Language Pathologist
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 180 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
J. Champley, J. W. Scherz, K. Apel, and A. N. Burda
A Preliminary Analysis of Reading Materials and Strategies Used by Older Adults
Communication Disorders Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 29(3): 131 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
L. M. Soederberg Miller and D. D. Gagne
Adult age differences in reading and rereading processes associated with problem solving
International Journal of Behavioral Development, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 34 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.