Use of Temporal Envelope Cues by Children With Developmental Dyslexia

lorenzi{at}psycho.univ-paris5.fr

This study evaluates the ability to process auditory temporal-envelope cues in a group of 6 children with dyslexia (mean age: 10;10 years;months). To address this issue, we measured (a) temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs), that is, the detection thresholds of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) applied to a white noise carrier, as a function of modulation frequency, f_m (f_m was 4, 16, 64, 256, and 1024 Hz) and (b) identification performance for vowel-consonantvowel (VCV) stimuli over 5 sessions. VCV stimuli were either unprocessed or digitally processed to remove the original spectral information, resulting in a timevarying speech envelope amplitude modulating a noise carrier. The same tests were conducted in 6 normal control children (mean age: 11;6 years;months) and 6 normal control adults (mean age: 24;8 years;months). SAM thresholds were similar in normal children and adults. For both normal groups, TMTFs were low pass in shape and showed low between-listener variability. TMTFs measured in children with dyslexia showed higher between-listener variability: TMTFs were band pass in 2 children, flat in 1 child, and low pass in the 3 others. Overall, SAM thresholds were higher in children with dyslexia than in normal children at f_m=4 and 1024 Hz. Unprocessed-speech identification performance was nearly perfect in normal children and adults, and impaired in children with dyslexia. "Speech-envelope noise" identification performance was poorer in normal children and children with dyslexia than in normal adults. Performance improved across sessions in normal children and adults, but remained constant in children with dyslexia. Compared to normal children, children with dyslexia showed poorer reception of voicing, manner, and place of articulation for unprocessed speech and poorer reception of voicing for "speech-envelope noise. " Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that some children with dyslexia may show abnormal auditory temporal-envelope processing. Such a deficit, in turn, may explain the difficulties of children with dyslexia with speech perception.

KEY WORDS: dyslexia, language impairment, temporal envelope, temporal acuity, auditory perception

Submitted on September 20, 1999
Accepted on July 25, 2000

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bertoncini, W. Serniclaes, and C. Lorenzi Discrimination of Speech Sounds Based Upon Temporal Envelope Versus Fine Structure Cues in 5- to 7-Year-Old Children J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2009; 52(3): 682 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Zettler, R. A. Sevcik, R. D. Morris, and M. G. Clarkson Comodulation Masking Release (CMR) in Children and the Influence of Reading Status J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 772 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Ziegler, C. Pech-Georgel, F. George, F.-X. Alario, and C. Lorenzi Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment PNAS, September 27, 2005; 102(39): 14110 - 14115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Liegeois-Chauvel, C. Lorenzi, A. Trebuchon, J. Regis, and P. Chauvel Temporal Envelope Processing in the Human Left and Right Auditory Cortices Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2004; 14(7): 731 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.L. Giraud, C. Kell, C. Thierfelder, P. Sterzer, M.O. Russ, C. Preibisch, and A. Kleinschmidt Contributions of Sensory Input, Auditory Search and Verbal Comprehension to Cortical Activity during Speech Processing Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2004; 14(3): 247 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ramus, S. Rosen, S. C. Dakin, B. L. Day, J. M. Castellote, S. White, and U. Frith Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults Brain, April 1, 2003; 126(4): 841 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]