JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.43 1389-1401 December 2000.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pittman, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stelmachowicz, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pittman, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stelmachowicz, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Perception of Voiceless Fricatives by Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Children and Adults

Andrea L. Pittman 1
Patricia G. Stelmachowicz 1

1 Boys Town National Research Hospital Omaha, NE

pittmana{at}boystown.org

This study examined the perceptual-weighting strategies and performance-audibility functions of 11 moderately hearing-impaired (HI) children, 11 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) children, 11 moderately HI adults, and 11 NH adults. The purpose was to (a) determine the perceptual-weighting strategies of HI children relative to the other groups and (b) determine the audibility required by each group to achieve a criterion level of performance. Stimuli were 4 nonsense syllables (/us/, /uint/, /uf/, and /uthgr/). The vowel, transition, and fricative segments of each nonsense syllable were identified along the temporal domain, and each segment was amplified randomly within each syllable during presentation. Point-biserial correlation coefficients were calculated using the amplitude variation of each segment and the correct and incorrect responses for the corresponding syllable. Results showed that for /us/ and /uint/, all four groups heavily weighted the fricative segments during perception, whereas the vowel and transition segments received little or no weight. For /uf/, relatively low weights were given to each segment by all four groups. For /uthgr/, the NH children and adults weighted the transition segment more so than the vowel and fricative segments, whereas the HI children and adults weighted all three segments equally low. Performance-audibility functions of the fricative segments of /us/ and /uint/ were constructed for each group. In general, maximum performance for each group was reached at lower audibility levels for /s/ than for /int/ and steeper functions were observed for the HI groups relative to the NH groups. A decision theory approach was used to confirm the audibility required by each group to achieve a ge90% level of performance. Results showed both hearing sensitivity and age effects. The HI listeners required lower levels of audibility than the NH listeners to achieve similar levels of performance. Likewise, the adult listeners required lower levels of audibility than the children, although this difference was more substantial for the NH listeners than for the HI listeners.

KEY WORDS: speech perception, adults, children hearing loss, normal hearing

Submitted on October 26, 1999
Accepted on August 10, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L.-F. Shi, L. H. Carney, and K. A. Doherty
Correction of the Peripheral Spatiotemporal Response Pattern: A Potential New Signal-Processing Strategy.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 848 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
S. Scollie, R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, D. Laurnagaray, S. Beaulac, and J. Pumford
The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 159 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.