Treating Stuttering in Young Children

Predicting Treatment Time in the Lidcombe Program

M.Onslow{at}cchs.usyd.edu.au

It is known that children may recover from stuttering without formal treatment during the first years after onset. Consequently, the timing of professional, early stuttering intervention is a pressing issue in speech-language pathology. This report presents data pertinent to this issue for 261 preschool-age children who received the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention. Of these children, 250 completed the program and were considered by their clinicians to have been treated successfully. For the children who were treated successfully, logistical regression analyses were used to determine whether age, gender, period from onset to treatment, and stuttering severity related systematically to the time required for treatment. The present data confirmed previous reports that a median of 11 clinic visits was required to achieve zero or near-zero stuttering with the Lidcombe Program. Results were also consistent with a preliminary report of 14 children (C. W. Starkweather & S. R. Gottwald, 1993) showing a significant relation between stuttering severity and the time needed for treatment, with children with more severe stuttering requiring longer treatment times than children with less severe stuttering. However, results did not associate either increasing age or increased onset-to-treatment intervals with longer treatment times. This finding is not consistent with the Starkweather and Gottwald report, which linked advancing age with longer treatment time. In fact, the present data suggest that, for a short period after stuttering onset in the preschool years, a short delay in treatment does not appear to increase treatment time. An important caveat to these data is that they cannot be generalized to late childhood or early adolescence. The present findings are discussed in relation to natural recovery from stuttering.

KEY WORDS: stuttering, preschool, treatment, regression, duration

Submitted on June 23, 1999
Accepted on March 27, 2000

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Miller and B. Guitar Long-Term Outcome of the Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering Intervention Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2009; 18(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Onslow, M. Jones, S. O'Brian, R. Menzies, and A. Packman Defining, Identifying, and Evaluating Clinical Trials of Stuttering Treatments: A Tutorial for Clinicians Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 401 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Millard, A. Nicholas, and F. M. Cook Is Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Effective in Reducing Stuttering? J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 636 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lewis, A. Packman, M. Onslow, J. M. Simpson, and M. Jones A Phase II Trial of Telehealth Delivery of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2008; 17(2): 139 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Onslow and J. S. Yaruss Differing Perspectives on What to Do With a Stuttering Preschooler and Why Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 65 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Yaruss, C. Coleman, and D. Hammer Treating preschool children who stutter: description and preliminary evaluation of a family-focused treatment approach. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2006; 37(2): 118 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Jones, M. Onslow, A. Packman, S. Williams, T. Ormond, I. Schwarz, and V. Gebski Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention BMJ, September 24, 2005; 331(7518): 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]