Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 1085-1090 October 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/077)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yao, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gantz, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yao, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gantz, B. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Stability of Low-Frequency Residual Hearing in Patients Who Are Candidates for Combined Acoustic Plus Electric Hearing

Wai Na Yao
Christopher W. Turner
Bruce J. Gantz

University of Iowa, Iowa City

Contact author: Christopher Turner, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, 250 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: cwturner{at}blue.weeg.uiowa.edu

The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability over time of low-frequency auditory thresholds to better determine if the new technique of using a short-electrode cochlear implant that preserves residual low-frequency acoustic hearing can be a long-term solution for those with severe-to-profound hearing loss at high frequencies. The present study determined the long-term rate of decline in acoustic hearing in patients who have a preexisting hearing loss yet have not been implanted with a cochlear implant. A retrospective analysis of patients' audiograms that fit into the range for candidacy for the short-electrode device was performed to calculate the rate of change of threshold over time. The analysis of adult patients' data indicated that there was an average of only 1.05 dB hearing deterioration per year in the low frequencies and that presbycusis accounted for approximately one third to one half of this decline. The average deterioration of hearing threshold for pediatric patients was 1.2 dB per year; however, the rates of change in pediatric patients were considerably more variable (across individuals and across frequencies) than in adults. These data provide support for the idea that the short-electrode cochlear implant may be a practical solution for most adults in the long run, but this may not be the case for all pediatric patients.

KEY WORDS: cochlear implants, audiogram, progressive hearing loss


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
M. Mandala, L. Colletti, G. Tonoli, and V. Colletti
Electrocochleography during Cochlear Implantation for Hearing Preservation
Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, May 1, 2012; 146(5): 774 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
R. M. Uchanski, L. S. Davidson, S. Quadrizius, R. Reeder, J. Cadieux, J. Kettel, and R. A. Chole
Two Ears and Two (or More?) Devices: A Pediatric Case Study of Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss
Trends in Amplification, June 1, 2009; 13(2): 107 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]