Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.55 487-499 April 2012. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0102)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fogerty, D.
Right arrow Articles by Humes, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fogerty, D.
Right arrow Articles by Humes, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Asynchronous Vowel-Pair Identification Across the Adult Life Span for Monaural and Dichotic Presentations

Daniel Fogertya
Diane Kewley-Porta
Larry E. Humesa
a Indiana University, Bloomington

Correspondence to Daniel Fogerty: fogerty{at}sc.edu

Purpose: Temporal order abilities decrease with age. Declining temporal processing abilities may influence the identification of rapid vowel sequences. Identification patterns for asynchronous vowel pairs were explored across the life span.

Method: Young, middle-aged, and older listeners completed temporal order tasks for pairs of 70-ms and 40-ms vowel stimuli. For a given vowel duration, naturally spoken vowels were equated for duration, intensity, and fundamental frequency. Listeners completed monaural and dichotic temporal order tasks that involved identifying the vowel pair in the correct order. The stimulus onset asynchrony that yielded 50% accuracy for identifying the vowel pair in the correct order was used to equate performance among listeners. Vowel identification response patterns were determined at this stimulus onset asynchrony threshold.

Results: Vowel identification patterns were largely consistent across age groups. Older listeners were influenced by the order of certain vowel pairs. Not all vowel pairs were identified equally well. Vowel dominance patterns were also observed, with /a/ being identified most accurately for the vowel pairs tested. Formant dynamics explained, in part, identification and confusion patterns.

Conclusion: Vowel identification accuracy patterns were reasonably similar across the life span, regardless of presentation mode, vowel duration, or effect of considerable stimulus exposure. Large effects of vowel order were observed, particularly for older listeners.

KEY WORDS: speech perception, vowel identification, concurrent vowels, aging, temporal processing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?